Teaching and Learning in a Net-Centric World

Three Generations of Pedagogy and Elephants in the Room

The good folks at DERN (Australia) posted a nice summary of Jon Dron and my article from the recent Connectivist special issue of IRRODL.  They write:

“A review of the three dominant learning theories: Cognitive-Behaviourist, Social-Constructivist and Connectivist, and the pedagogies derived from them. The review is very relevant to the use of digital technologies in education using a community of inquiry analysis model beginning with a description of each learning theory and then analyses of the cognitive presence, social presence and teacher presence, and concludes with a summary of the strengths and weaknesses of each. This paper is a must read for educators interested in elearning.

Over a beer and salty tears yesterday, (we were watching the Canucks get hammered by the Bruins), Jon and I were talking about a slide set he was preparing for a presentation to our Nursing Faculty here at Athabasca.  One of the slides shows a fourth integrative pedagogy that it refers to as holist.

ishot-83

We had a bit of discussion if holist isn’t just a term for appropriate use of all three pedagogical generations, which we argue for in the paper, thus making the need for a fourth term redundant – just as modern distance education uses multiple generations of communications technologies (print, video, web etc.)

The slides are quite evocative, and the theme expands on Jon’s  ideas of soft and hard technologies and talks about the “elephant in the room” – that being the impact of the teacher/tutor. Though generally accepted as critical in campus based education, in distance education, there has always been much more a sense of replacement of teachers with better content, self-direction and more recently with peer learning – see my “equivalency theory” for more descriptions about the capacity to substitute one type of interaction for another. Jon argues that the human presence and flexibility of the tutor is useful in ‘softening’ the otherwise hard systems that often are associated with distance education systems – and especially the large mega universities.

Not that I have anything against teachers (after all I am one!), but they are expensive. I still think we can achieve better  and  ‘softer’ implementations using flexible and user defined content, peer groups and other ways besides thinking that there is ALWAYS an elephant that must be in the room somewhere – the teacher.

Anyways, you may enjoy Jon’s slides (I did) at

http://www.slideshare.net/jondron/revealing-the-elephant-in-the-online-classroom

Similar posts
  • Teaching at Jiangnan University, Wuxi... My 4 week trip to China is a week done, and I thought I would document the trip to date (you know us old guys have trouble remembering the details!). Four years I received a request to host and sponsor a PhD student from Bejing Normal School. Zhijun Wang soon worked her way into our [...]
  • What the FOLC is new in this article? Sorry, but I couldn’t resist spoofing, in the post title,  the unfortunate sound of the acronym for the “new” model proposed in this article. Now,  I’ve got it out of the way and can only suggest that if this “divergent fork of the Community of Inquiry model” is to survive, it needs a new English [...]
  • Is Google Scholar a Filter Bubble? A major  goal of net-based  mass media is to customize the feed that is delivered to each viewer received a unique screen that matches their interest and more importantly their likelihood of purchasing some product or viewing some paid for message.  This phenomenon was labeled as “filter bubble” by author Eli Pariser – meaning that certain results [...]
  • Quality in Online Learning Presentati... I was asked to do a video conferencing talk to a meeting of three Mexican Universities yesterday. They are attempting to come up with a common set of criteria to define and measure the quality of their online courses. Perhaps I was not the best person to ask, as I have very mixed feelings about [...]
  • Our Spanish adventure Unlike most of our voyages, this month I was accompanying my wife Susan on a trip to her conference. She registered in the 16 European Symposium on Suicide Prevention that took place this month in Oviedo, Spain. We took the opportunity to rent a car and bought a GPS with European maps (thank god!) and travelled [...]

3 Comments

  1. June 11, 2011    

    Very useful paper and graphic. Thanks

  2. June 13, 2011    

    Thanks Terry, for the usual great post and the link to the interesting slides. I was wondering, though, whether the ‘hard – soft’ continuum could more accurately be described as a ‘neat – scruffy’ continuum (harking back to old debates in which I was involved). And I’m not sure that Moodle is necessarily ‘hard’ – can’t it be hard or soft (neat or scruffy), just as can occur in a physical classroom? But maybe I just don’t understand …
    Thanks especially, too, for playing the (inordinately inexpensive) elephant in our classroom last month. It was a wonderful way to give ‘life’ to our discussion of the special issue on connectivism. We loved it!
    PS Sorry about the Canuks – my rugby team, the Melbourne Rebels, is languishing near the bottom of the Super Rugby ladder (first season can be tough!).

  3. JPaz JPaz
    July 28, 2011    

    Jesus, a hard metaphor, the teacher as an elephant.

    Just quoted your paper in my phD plan. Tony Bates also elected conectivism as a third elearning pedagogy V. Bates, T. (2011). Understanding Web 2.0 and its Implications for E-Learning. Web 2.0 Based E-learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching.

    My question: are the CoI preseches you used to characterize the 3 pedagogies appliable to all or aren’t they specific to the constructivist pedagogy for which they were created?

    Best Regards Prof Terry Anderson
    JPaz

No Pings Yet

  1. Pontydysgu – Bridge to Learning - Educational Research on October 3, 2011 at 7:58 am
  2. Three Generations of Pedagogy and Elephants in the Room | Virtual Canuck « Educación, TIC y Opinión on March 11, 2012 at 5:05 am
  3. Three Generations of Pedagogy and Elephants in the Room | Virtual Canuck « Educación, TIC y Opinión on April 28, 2012 at 3:31 pm
  4. Three Generations of Pedagogy and Elephants in the Room | Virtual Canuck | The 21st century classroom | Scoop.it on May 2, 2012 at 11:03 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Virtual Canuck via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 63 other subscribers

My posts by Category

My Blog Archives

Subscribe

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • SlideShare
  • RSS Feed for Posts
  • Email

Follow me on Twitter