Teaching and Learning in a Net-Centric World

Three Generations of Pedagogy and Elephants in the Room

The good folks at DERN (Australia) posted a nice summary of Jon Dron and my article from the recent Connectivist special issue of IRRODL.  They write:

“A review of the three dominant learning theories: Cognitive-Behaviourist, Social-Constructivist and Connectivist, and the pedagogies derived from them. The review is very relevant to the use of digital technologies in education using a community of inquiry analysis model beginning with a description of each learning theory and then analyses of the cognitive presence, social presence and teacher presence, and concludes with a summary of the strengths and weaknesses of each. This paper is a must read for educators interested in elearning.

Over a beer and salty tears yesterday, (we were watching the Canucks get hammered by the Bruins), Jon and I were talking about a slide set he was preparing for a presentation to our Nursing Faculty here at Athabasca.  One of the slides shows a fourth integrative pedagogy that it refers to as holist.


We had a bit of discussion if holist isn’t just a term for appropriate use of all three pedagogical generations, which we argue for in the paper, thus making the need for a fourth term redundant – just as modern distance education uses multiple generations of communications technologies (print, video, web etc.)

The slides are quite evocative, and the theme expands on Jon’s  ideas of soft and hard technologies and talks about the “elephant in the room” – that being the impact of the teacher/tutor. Though generally accepted as critical in campus based education, in distance education, there has always been much more a sense of replacement of teachers with better content, self-direction and more recently with peer learning – see my “equivalency theory” for more descriptions about the capacity to substitute one type of interaction for another. Jon argues that the human presence and flexibility of the tutor is useful in ‘softening’ the otherwise hard systems that often are associated with distance education systems – and especially the large mega universities.

Not that I have anything against teachers (after all I am one!), but they are expensive. I still think we can achieve better  and  ‘softer’ implementations using flexible and user defined content, peer groups and other ways besides thinking that there is ALWAYS an elephant that must be in the room somewhere – the teacher.

Anyways, you may enjoy Jon’s slides (I did) at


Similar posts
  • New Book from AUPress – An Onli... I was pleased to receive in the post a hard copy of a new book in the Issues in Distance Education book series, for which I continue to serve as the series editor. Now of course you can read all of the books in this series as they are available for download  under Creative Commons [...]
  • Qualitative Research Rebooted 2018 For the past two months, I’ve been occupied with a qualitative study of teachers’ use of digital technology in Alberta Schools. The study is sponsored by the Alberta Teachers’ Association.  It has been very useful for me to get down to actually doing a full scale qualitative study after years of teaching grad students research [...]
  • More on Distance Education Journal Ra... Both academics and administrators love to argue about the value (impact) of their academic work.  The old adage of “Publish or Perish” still has currency. Despite the many distribution opportunities besides and beyond publishing in scholarly journals, the bean counters (myself included) love citation indexes. The basic idea is that the more your work is [...]
  • Teaching at Jiangnan University, Wuxi... My 4 week trip to China is a week done, and I thought I would document the trip to date (you know us old guys have trouble remembering the details!). Four years I received a request to host and sponsor a PhD student from Bejing Normal School. Zhijun Wang soon worked her way into our [...]
  • What the FOLC is new in this article? Sorry, but I couldn’t resist spoofing, in the post title,  the unfortunate sound of the acronym for the “new” model proposed in this article. Now,  I’ve got it out of the way and can only suggest that if this “divergent fork of the Community of Inquiry model” is to survive, it needs a new English [...]


  1. June 11, 2011    

    Very useful paper and graphic. Thanks

  2. June 13, 2011    

    Thanks Terry, for the usual great post and the link to the interesting slides. I was wondering, though, whether the ‘hard – soft’ continuum could more accurately be described as a ‘neat – scruffy’ continuum (harking back to old debates in which I was involved). And I’m not sure that Moodle is necessarily ‘hard’ – can’t it be hard or soft (neat or scruffy), just as can occur in a physical classroom? But maybe I just don’t understand …
    Thanks especially, too, for playing the (inordinately inexpensive) elephant in our classroom last month. It was a wonderful way to give ‘life’ to our discussion of the special issue on connectivism. We loved it!
    PS Sorry about the Canuks – my rugby team, the Melbourne Rebels, is languishing near the bottom of the Super Rugby ladder (first season can be tough!).

  3. JPaz JPaz
    July 28, 2011    

    Jesus, a hard metaphor, the teacher as an elephant.

    Just quoted your paper in my phD plan. Tony Bates also elected conectivism as a third elearning pedagogy V. Bates, T. (2011). Understanding Web 2.0 and its Implications for E-Learning. Web 2.0 Based E-learning: Applying Social Informatics for Tertiary Teaching.

    My question: are the CoI preseches you used to characterize the 3 pedagogies appliable to all or aren’t they specific to the constructivist pedagogy for which they were created?

    Best Regards Prof Terry Anderson

No Pings Yet

  1. Pontydysgu – Bridge to Learning - Educational Research on October 3, 2011 at 7:58 am
  2. Three Generations of Pedagogy and Elephants in the Room | Virtual Canuck « Educación, TIC y Opinión on March 11, 2012 at 5:05 am
  3. Three Generations of Pedagogy and Elephants in the Room | Virtual Canuck « Educación, TIC y Opinión on April 28, 2012 at 3:31 pm
  4. Three Generations of Pedagogy and Elephants in the Room | Virtual Canuck | The 21st century classroom | Scoop.it on May 2, 2012 at 11:03 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Virtual Canuck via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 332 other subscribers

My posts by Category

My Blog Archives


  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • SlideShare
  • RSS Feed for Posts
  • Email

Follow me on Twitter