Teaching and Learning in a Net-Centric World

Citation Ratings in Distance Education Journals

The following post will likely seem as very self-serving, as it positively reflects on the impact of the Journal of which I edit. But, besides self aggrandizement, I hope the post encourages you to subscribe, submit an article or offer to review articles to IRRODL our online and open access journal.

Determining the relevant value, impact and prestige of any academic Journal is challenging, often idiosyncratic and subject to charges of favoring the established outlets over the emerging. The for profit Thomson Empire has for years dominated this business with their ISI listings (for example see comparisons of Educational journals at http://in-cites.com/research/2004/october_25_2004-2.html). Unfortunately not all Journals, and especially not newer and online journals are represented in Thomson indexes. Most particularly none of the major distance education journals are indexed.

A 2005 article An Examination of Citation Counts in a New Scholarly Communication Environment by Kathleen Bauer and Nisa Bakkalbasi compares the results of citation counts (the number of times an article is referenced by another article) between Thomson’s Web of Science, Scopus, and Google Scholar. They conclude that “A search of Google Scholar will likely reveal both traditional journal articles, some of which will also be covered in Web of Science and Scopus, and additional unique material, but the scholarly value of some of the unique material remains an open question.” This open question refers to all the distance education journals – since none are indexed by Thompson or any others that I am aware of. Bauer and Bakkalbasi note the value of Google Scholar for citation indexing and thus I was encouraged to see what results come from Google Scholar searches of peer reviewed distance education journals.

The method I choose was to use the advanced search capacity of Google Scholar to search for articles published in the most well read, English language, peer-reviewed Distance Education journals and to count the number of times each of the top ten articles returned had been cited in other articles referenced in Google Scholar. Google Scholar sorts articles retrieved based upon the number of these citations. Since the longer the period of time since an article has been published increaes the likelihood of its being cited, I also restricted the timeframe to articles published since 1999.

The results are as follows:

It is interesting to note that the two Canadian Journals (two of three highest rated) are also the only open access journals providing full text of all articles, while the two lowest scoring Journals (as well as AJDE) are available only to paid subscribers.

So, to conclude for highest impact in your distance education reading or publishing – get involved with IRRODL!!!!

Similar posts
  • New Book from AUPress – An Onli... I was pleased to receive in the post a hard copy of a new book in the Issues in Distance Education book series, for which I continue to serve as the series editor. Now of course you can read all of the books in this series as they are available for download  under Creative Commons [...]
  • Qualitative Research Rebooted 2018 For the past two months, I’ve been occupied with a qualitative study of teachers’ use of digital technology in Alberta Schools. The study is sponsored by the Alberta Teachers’ Association.  It has been very useful for me to get down to actually doing a full scale qualitative study after years of teaching grad students research [...]
  • More on Distance Education Journal Ra... Both academics and administrators love to argue about the value (impact) of their academic work.  The old adage of “Publish or Perish” still has currency. Despite the many distribution opportunities besides and beyond publishing in scholarly journals, the bean counters (myself included) love citation indexes. The basic idea is that the more your work is [...]
  • What the FOLC is new in this article? Sorry, but I couldn’t resist spoofing, in the post title,  the unfortunate sound of the acronym for the “new” model proposed in this article. Now,  I’ve got it out of the way and can only suggest that if this “divergent fork of the Community of Inquiry model” is to survive, it needs a new English [...]
  • Quality in Online Learning Presentati... I was asked to do a video conferencing talk to a meeting of three Mexican Universities yesterday. They are attempting to come up with a common set of criteria to define and measure the quality of their online courses. Perhaps I was not the best person to ask, as I have very mixed feelings about [...]

Subscribe to Virtual Canuck via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 332 other subscribers

My posts by Category

My Blog Archives


  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • SlideShare
  • RSS Feed for Posts
  • Email

Follow me on Twitter