Teaching and Learning in a Net-Centric World

Scratch one up for Google Scholar

Google Scholar has tremendous potential to aide academics, students and lifelong learners because it is fast, easy to use and always accessible. But how well does it does it work?

I’ve noticed a distinct apprehension of the service by librarians – perhaps because it’s proponents claim it does most of what their libraries pay hundreds of thousands of dollars for in annual subscriptions to publisher data bases of scholarly articles. To try to determine its utility for undergraduate students, three faculty from the University of Toronto developed an interesting test – Helms-Park, R.; Radia, P. & Stapleton, P. (2007) A preliminary assessment of Google Scholar as a source of EAP students’ research materials. The Internet and Higher Education 10 (1) 65-76.

Three independent judges used a tool to evaluate resources submitted by students as an annotated bibliography in an English for Academic Purposes course. The instrument measured authority, objectivity, rigour, and transparency of each resource, with the judges being unaware of its source. The three sources were a general Google search, Google Scholar or the University library’s academic journal data bases. As expected, the study found that a general Google search returned resources that were significantly lower on all four quality indicators than those retrieved via Google Scholar and were also lower on all but transparency between general Goggle and the library databases. This indicating that general Google returns resources that are most the popular and sometimes influenced by advertisers- not usually the best referents to quality academic resources.

But most interesting was the finding that “for all practical purposes, Google Scholar equaled library e-searches in its capacity to yield high-quality sources in response to queries made by relatively inexperienced writers in an introductory EAP course”. This result is great news for distance education students and lifelong learners who may not have ready access to University libraries. Unfortunately, Google Scholar doesn’t always link to the full text, (oh- for more Open Access!) but it is very easy to use and can be used to find citations and references that can then be requested from online libraries or interlibrary retrieval.

The article also makes brief reference to Microsofts academic.live.com site – a recent, late competetor to the Google Scholar site. I did a quick test using the (admittedly self promoting) terms – “community of inquiry” distance anderson- and  had acdemic.live return 19 references, 17 of which were to my work. By comparison Google scholar returned 449 references  with at least the first 40 all being references to my work. So again Google Scholar seems hot (or at least ego boosting!).

I’m usually reluctant to review or comment on articles published in closed (not open access) venues, but I making an exception in this case. Interesting that this article itself does not yet appear in Google Scholar, while articles published at about the same time this year in the open Access Journal that I edit (IRRODL) are fully referenced in Google Scholar and links are provided directly to PDF, and HTML versions. This leads me to wonder, if we have freely accessible, high quality indexing, a growing number of high quality peer reviewed journals and ubiquitous networking- do we really need commercial publishers anymore?

Nonetheless the study demonstrates the scholarly contribution made by Google scholar and underscores this value added resource for distance and lifelong learners.

Similar posts
  • What the FOLC is new in this article? Sorry, but I couldn’t resist spoofing, in the post title,  the unfortunate sound of the acronym for the “new” model proposed in this article. Now,  I’ve got it out of the way and can only suggest that if this “divergent fork of the Community of Inquiry model” is to survive, it needs a new English [...]
  • Quality in Online Learning Presentati... I was asked to do a video conferencing talk to a meeting of three Mexican Universities yesterday. They are attempting to come up with a common set of criteria to define and measure the quality of their online courses. Perhaps I was not the best person to ask, as I have very mixed feelings about [...]
  • Our Spanish adventure Unlike most of our voyages, this month I was accompanying my wife Susan on a trip to her conference. She registered in the 16 European Symposium on Suicide Prevention that took place this month in Oviedo, Spain. We took the opportunity to rent a car and bought a GPS with European maps (thank god!) and travelled [...]
  • Downe’s great summary article, ... The good news is that Stephen Downes has posted the  full text from a chapter he wrote for New Models of Open and Distance Learning in Open Education: from OERs to MOOCs, Editors: Mohamed Jemni, Kinshuk, Mohamed Koutheair Khribi,  2016. This is good news for two reasons – the first is that the full Springer book [...]
  • Order of Athabasca University Yesterday at Convocation in Athabasca, I was deeply honoured by my former colleagues at Athabasca by being installed into the Order of Athabasca University. Most other members have been individuals from the community who have made exceptional contributions to the University. I was the first Faculty member (other than Dominique Abrioux, who also served as [...]

2 Comments

  1. September 3, 2007    

    Often a Scholar search ends at a publisher’s website with an invitation to remove your credit card from your wallet, but sometimes you get lucky…

    A Scholar search for “A preliminary assessment of Google Scholar as a source of EAP students’ research materials” will find the article citation, but instead of clicking on the title, choose “Web Search”.

    In the resulting search box refine your search by adding “filetype:pdf” click search and choose the second result. Voilà! Not quite open access, but the next best thing–at least until the publisher requests its removal.

  2. September 26, 2007    

    I see my search strategy (above) no longer works–strangely the article seems now to be invisible to Google’s bots–despite it still existing online. Here’s the full URL: http://gateway.uvic.ca/blogs/refdesk/archives/google_scholar.pdf

No Pings Yet

  1. steve bingham's blog · books 2: itch & scratch on October 29, 2007 at 2:38 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Virtual Canuck via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 329 other subscribers

My posts by Category

My Blog Archives

Subscribe

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • SlideShare
  • RSS Feed for Posts
  • Email

Follow me on Twitter