Teaching and Learning in a Net-Centric World
Similar posts
  • What the FOLC is new in this article? Sorry, but I couldn’t resist spoofing, in the post title,  the unfortunate sound of the acronym for the “new” model proposed in this article. Now,  I’ve got it out of the way and can only suggest that if this “divergent fork of the Community of Inquiry model” is to survive, it needs a new English [...]
  • Quality in Online Learning Presentati... I was asked to do a video conferencing talk to a meeting of three Mexican Universities yesterday. They are attempting to come up with a common set of criteria to define and measure the quality of their online courses. Perhaps I was not the best person to ask, as I have very mixed feelings about [...]
  • Our Spanish adventure Unlike most of our voyages, this month I was accompanying my wife Susan on a trip to her conference. She registered in the 16 European Symposium on Suicide Prevention that took place this month in Oviedo, Spain. We took the opportunity to rent a car and bought a GPS with European maps (thank god!) and travelled [...]
  • Downe’s great summary article, ... The good news is that Stephen Downes has posted the  full text from a chapter he wrote for New Models of Open and Distance Learning in Open Education: from OERs to MOOCs, Editors: Mohamed Jemni, Kinshuk, Mohamed Koutheair Khribi,  2016. This is good news for two reasons – the first is that the full Springer book [...]
  • Order of Athabasca University Yesterday at Convocation in Athabasca, I was deeply honoured by my former colleagues at Athabasca by being installed into the Order of Athabasca University. Most other members have been individuals from the community who have made exceptional contributions to the University. I was the first Faculty member (other than Dominique Abrioux, who also served as [...]

2 Comments

  1. May 2, 2007    

    I did suggest an alternative – ‘collection’.

    My use of the term ‘collective’ last year was as an adjective, not a noun.

    The term ‘collective’ – used either way – connotes the many becoming one. This is the fourth definition of the four you list above – but also the first and second. And also by the Borg. Where group identity subsumes individual identity.

    The distinction between a group and what you call a collective is subtle (and the use of the word ‘collective’ masks that distinction). Groups have properties of their own, but collections (sets) have no properties other than the aggregated properties of their members.

    For example, suppose we had 50 people in a classroom, and suppose they took a vote. If we say “the class decided ‘no'” then the class is being treated as a group. But if we say “most people in the class voted ‘no'” then it is being treated as (what I would call) a collection.

    In the example above, we would say “the collective voted ‘no'” and it would make sense. That’s why I think the word ‘collective’ refers to a type of group. To use ‘colection’ we would have to sy “Most members of the collection voted ‘no'”.

    Now if this doesn’t capture the distinction you had in mind, then I’ll come back to that and question the distinction itself, for then I would find an increasingly narrow space between a ‘collective’ and a ‘group’.

  2. May 28, 2007    

    The Borg analogy was suggested to me by a student who had been using some of my social software a few years ago and it struck me as quite insightful. I think that what we are talking about is actually a kind of cyborg, formed partly from the collection of people and partly from the software.

    A collection of people voting is not an actor (it is just a collection of people voting), though it may have an influence on one that does act.

    In social software, the collection _combined with_ the software (i.e. the algorithms and the presentation) makes choices and suggestions that materially affect how people behave. The behaviour of this actor both shapes and is shaped by the behaviour of its participants.

    This strange hybrid cyber-organism needs a different name – I don’t think ‘collection’ quite covers it!

No Pings Yet

  1. Library clips :: Blogs : the many ways “many” come together :: June :: 2007 on June 7, 2007 at 1:14 am
  2. Jason Rhode’s Dissertation Digest » Interaction Matrix Brainstorm on November 9, 2007 at 9:34 am
  3. Library clips :: Collaboration, Emergence and Culture :: April :: 2008 on April 7, 2008 at 4:33 pm

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Virtual Canuck via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 329 other subscribers

My posts by Category

My Blog Archives

Subscribe

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • SlideShare
  • RSS Feed for Posts
  • Email

Follow me on Twitter