Teaching and Learning in a Net-Centric World
Similar posts
  • New Book from AUPress – An Onli... I was pleased to receive in the post a hard copy of a new book in the Issues in Distance Education book series, for which I continue to serve as the series editor. Now of course you can read all of the books in this series as they are available for download  under Creative Commons [...]
  • Qualitative Research Rebooted 2018 For the past two months, I’ve been occupied with a qualitative study of teachers’ use of digital technology in Alberta Schools. The study is sponsored by the Alberta Teachers’ Association.  It has been very useful for me to get down to actually doing a full scale qualitative study after years of teaching grad students research [...]
  • More on Distance Education Journal Ra... Both academics and administrators love to argue about the value (impact) of their academic work.  The old adage of “Publish or Perish” still has currency. Despite the many distribution opportunities besides and beyond publishing in scholarly journals, the bean counters (myself included) love citation indexes. The basic idea is that the more your work is [...]
  • What the FOLC is new in this article? Sorry, but I couldn’t resist spoofing, in the post title,  the unfortunate sound of the acronym for the “new” model proposed in this article. Now,  I’ve got it out of the way and can only suggest that if this “divergent fork of the Community of Inquiry model” is to survive, it needs a new English [...]
  • Quality in Online Learning Presentati... I was asked to do a video conferencing talk to a meeting of three Mexican Universities yesterday. They are attempting to come up with a common set of criteria to define and measure the quality of their online courses. Perhaps I was not the best person to ask, as I have very mixed feelings about [...]


  1. October 20, 2008    

    This distinction oversimplifies too much for me.

    Here’s one example. We can call all the residents in the state of New Jersey a group, yet they are very diverse in their demographics, especially considering the large numbers of immigrants here.

    I also have two books on my desk. One is titled “Small groups as complex systems” by Arrow, McGrath, and Berdahl. In the other, “Theories of Small Groups” by Poole and Hollingshead, there are two chapters titled “The network perspective on small groups: Theory and research” and “Traces, trajectories, and timing: The temporal perspective on groups.”

    In the former, if a small group is a complex system, then knowledge is emergent in it. In the latter, the small group is studied as a network.

  2. October 20, 2008    

    Thanks for the references above Charles. I don’t really consider myself an expert on small groups- mostly just an educator, but having said that I’m not sure of the charge of oversimplification or if there is an implication that these references show i have missed the point all together.

    I never argued that groups can not be complex and thus the possibility of emergent knowledge. The control exercised by group leaders often serves to reduce complexity and they rarely operate “on the edge of chaos” but I think it is possible.

    Groups may also be studied using network analysis tools as I suggest is happening in your second reference. As you know these provide visual maps of connectivity, leadership etc. I would expect that in most groups leadership causes much more formal and regularly structured traces than one would find in networks. This may be interesting, but I don’t think it is as compelling or enlightening as using network analysis tools on networks, but certainly it can be done.

  3. October 20, 2008    

    Hi Terry,

    Great post. I like to see these ideas discussed. I have a follow-up question on the definition of networks, groups, and collectives that I hope you can answer for me.

    I’ve always though of groups and collectives as parts of a network. I’ve considered group interactions to be networked interactions, with members as nodes in our network. I favor Lave & Wenger’s concept of legitimate peripheral participation to explain the influence of all members on the collective knowledge of the group.

    My question is, how do you distinguish networks, groups, and collectives from one another? Are they independent categories? Overlapping? Hierarchical?


  4. October 21, 2008    

    I should have been clearer. I was responding to Stephen’s points more than to yours. He makes too sharp a distinction between networks and groups.

    If you look at any complex system (i.e., group), it has a network infrastructure, and so rather than contrast networks and groups, it might be more productive to analyze networks along a continuum that includes factors such as intensity of connections, direction of connections, and so on, with the result being that some groups are special types of networks, or perhaps some networks are special types of groups.

  5. October 21, 2008    

    Responding to Dan’s question (comment #3 above), I tend to think of the 3 has having distinct qualities, but there are hybrid associations of the many, and associated tools that can operate at more than one or morph between group and network functioning. Jon Dron and I tried to develop the qualities and characteristics in a 2007 paper. Collectives, Networks and Groups in Social Software for E-Learning at http://www.editlib.org/index.cfm/files/paper_26726.pdf?fuseaction=Reader
    That might help disambiguate the three.
    Thanks for your interest.

  6. October 22, 2008    

    thank you for this post. I am currently doing a course in Knowledge Building theory at Uni of Toronto, where the unit of reference is always the “class” – partly, no doubt, because much of the research has been done in primary and secondary school settings. I myself mostly function in “network mode”, in the open edu and edutech blogosphere, etc, however for example David Wiley’s class in ’07 was a powerful learning experience as a “cohort” moving together a set amount of material together. So currently I am struggling to reconcile connectivism (which I don’t know much about, just what I’ve gleaned from Stephen’s, Siemens’ and others blog posts – I keep meaning to sit down and “read through” a lot of CK08 material), with Knowledge Building.

    This is doubly relevant since I am currently involved in launching http://peer2peeruniversity.org, which is based on a course/learning group structure (although all material would be open to all), and this has been criticized by for example George Siemens, who I assume want more of a network approach.

    Anyway I appreciated your thoughts, they were helpful.

No Pings Yet

  1. When the Teacher Doesn’t Show Up « Arieliondotcom the LORD-loving Learning Lion on October 21, 2008 at 9:52 am
  2. A shift in learning and teaching paradigm - Connectivism as a New teaching and learning theory? « Suifaijohnmak’s Weblog on October 24, 2008 at 7:53 pm
  3. Paper 2: Welcome to the Exploratorium! « Arieliondotcom the LORD-loving Learning Lion on November 3, 2008 at 12:47 pm
  4. NOTES FROM DAY 1 OF THE VIRTUAL WORLDS IN EDUCATION CONFERENCE, 10 NOV 08 « Arieliondotcom the LORD-loving Learning Lion on November 11, 2008 at 8:02 am
  5. » El viejo y el mar - versión animada - OLDaily 20 de octubre/08 El Blog Boyacense: El sitio de referencia de tod@s l@s boyacenses on November 15, 2008 at 2:44 am
  6. Social contexts for learning « Grockit Blog on November 23, 2009 at 9:42 pm
  7. ¿Cómo medir un GryC? Aproximación desde el análisis de contenido « Estelaripa's Blog on March 24, 2010 at 8:36 am
  8. Trabalho Colaborativo « Procurando Pontes…de Humanização da Tecnologia on December 18, 2012 at 5:39 am

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Virtual Canuck via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 332 other subscribers

My posts by Category

My Blog Archives


  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • SlideShare
  • RSS Feed for Posts
  • Email

Follow me on Twitter