Teaching and Learning in a Net-Centric World

Teaching Practices Inventory – Fast and easy!

instructional practcies inventoryThanks to Rick Reis’s Tomorrow’s Professor newsletter I bumped into an instrument that I think can be a very important addition to or replacement for teaching evaluations and/or student course evaluations. This Teaching Practices Inventory was developed by the Noble Prize winning Physicist Carl Wieman who was hired at the University of British Columbia to change his scientific research focus from Science to the Teaching of Science. UBC established an “initiative” for him at http://www.cwsei.ubc.ca/

He has produced an instrument that allows Faculty to assess their course teaching design through a focus on activities- what the students actually do and resources they have access to. It provides a quantifiable score, only takes 10 minutes, is available for use free and online.

In the 2014 article below he notes the problems with other methods such as student end of course evaluations, peer or Chair observations and assessments and other time consuming and possible threatening assessment tools.
In the shorter article from Change Magazine

Wieman, C. (2015). A Better Way to Evaluate Undergraduate Teaching. Change Magazine, Jan-Feb. http://www.changemag.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2015/January-February%202015/better-way-full.html.
Or the more scholarly work at
Wieman, C., & Gilbert, S. (2014). The teaching practices inventory: a new tool for characterizing college and university teaching in mathematics and science. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 13(3), 552-569.

Wieman explains the research base for each of the eight categories and the questions used to measure these. The categories are summed using a rubric. These categories are:

I. Course information provided (including learning goals or outcomes)
II. Supporting materials provided
III. In-class features and activities
IV. Assignments
V. Feedback and testing
VI. Other (diagnostics, pre–post testing, new methods with measures, etc.)
VII. Training and guidance of TAs
VIII. Collaboration or sharing in teaching

For each category the inventory asks teachers to list the activities that are components of the class, as for example the following:

  • Assignments with feedback before grading or with opportunity to redo work to improve grade

  • Students see marked assignments

  • List of topics to be covered

  • List of topic-specific competencies (skills, expertise …) students should achieve (what students should be able to do)

  • Assessment given at beginning of course to assess background knowledge

  • Teaching assistants receive one-half day or more of training in teaching (from http://www.lifescied.org/content/13/3/552.full)

The other benefit of this is that teachers who complete the Inventory are exposed to research-based best practices and can reflect on their own teaching practices. This is also much easier to complete than trying to coerce or hire external experts to do a course activity inventory.

All in all I think this is a very useful tool and as importantly, fast and easy to do!

 

Similar posts
  • Is Google Scholar a Filter Bubble? A major  goal of net-based  mass media is to customize the feed that is delivered to each viewer received a unique screen that matches their interest and more importantly their likelihood of purchasing some product or viewing some paid for message.  This phenomenon was labeled as “filter bubble” by author Eli Pariser – meaning that certain results [...]
  • Quality in Online Learning Presentati... I was asked to do a video conferencing talk to a meeting of three Mexican Universities yesterday. They are attempting to come up with a common set of criteria to define and measure the quality of their online courses. Perhaps I was not the best person to ask, as I have very mixed feelings about [...]
  • Order of Athabasca University Yesterday at Convocation in Athabasca, I was deeply honoured by my former colleagues at Athabasca by being installed into the Order of Athabasca University. Most other members have been individuals from the community who have made exceptional contributions to the University. I was the first Faculty member (other than Dominique Abrioux, who also served as [...]
  • Research–Practice Partnerships in Edu... My Google Scholar alert notified me that one of my articles was cited in an as yet not publisher preprint in Educational Researcher.  I don’t usually bother with articles hidden behind paywalls, but I was intrigued by the title: Coburn, C. E., & Penuel, W. R. (2016). Research–Practice Partnerships in Education: Outcomes, Dynamics, and Open [...]
  • The Enigma of Interaction I’ve been fascinated by the role of interaction all of my career as both a student, a researcher and a teacher. Michael Moore’s famous article details the role of  the ‘big three’ (student-student, student-content, student-teacher) interactions and influenced Randy Garrison and I to explore the other 3 possibilities (teacher-teacher, teacher-content and content-content interactions).  I’ve written a [...]

No Comments Yet

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Subscribe to Virtual Canuck via Email

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

Join 59 other subscribers

My Blog Archives

Subscribe

  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • SlideShare
  • RSS Feed for Posts
  • Email

Follow me on Twitter